Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Drones soar past their military uses

Written By limadu on Jumat, 30 November 2012 | 21.29

Unmanned flying machines aren't just for tracking down bad guys anymore.

(Fortune) -- The word "drone" probably doesn't make you think "fun" or even "useful." After all, the most familiar unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is the hulking, weaponized, and sinisterly named Predator deployed by the U.S. military. But drones are destined for gentler tasks; they could be making their way into homes as tools and into distressed areas as humanitarian aids. French company Parrot is already selling its high-end toy, the $300 AR.Drone 2.0, to consumers.

Utility

Drone experts imagine do-it-yourselfers tossing a UAV in the back of their trucks alongside their chainsaw and toolbox. UAVs could be used to monitor crops, for example, or by homeowners who want to check rain gutters without climbing on the roof.

Humanitarian

Advanced image processors could scan and identify areas hit by natural disasters, feeding information to relief workers on the ground. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has also promoted research into using UAVs to deliver vaccines to remote populations.

Fun and games

Phone and tablet apps can already pilot drones and allow owners to pit their piloting skills against each other. Cameras embedded into the hulls capture high-definition still photos and videos, getting aerial shots that used to require elaborate equipment.

This story is from the December 3, 2012 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 6:26 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Europe's jobless lines keep growing

Unemployment in Europe hits a new peak, and worse may be to come

LONDON (CNNMoney) -- Unemployment in the eurozone hit a new peak in October, underlining the misery facing millions of households suffering the effects of a recession that could last well into next year.

Eurostat data released Friday showed the jobless total in the 17-nation currency area rose by 173,000 to 18.7 million in October, boosting the unemployment rate to 11.7%. That figure stood at 11.6% in September, and compares with a rate of 7.9% in the U.S.

In the 27-nation European Union, 25.9 million people were out of work, pushing the unemployment rate to 10.7%, from 10.6% in September.

Over the course of the past 12 months, the number of people who were unemployed in the eurozone rose by nearly 2.2 million, with Greece, Portugal and Spain registering the highest year-over-year increases, as they implement deep spending cuts, tax rises and reforms to reduce borrowing.

Greece, which has won more time to meet budget targets under an international bailout program, has an unemployment rate of 25.4%. Only Spain is in a worse state - with a rate of over 26% - and that number could rise further still.

Some of Spain's weakest banks are planning to shed thousands of staff in order to receive rescue funding from the EU.

Related: Service sector adds to eurozone gloom

While the mood among businesses has picked up a little, rising unemployment is depressing consumer confidence and households are becoming increasingly concerned about their financial situation.

Even countries such as Germany and France, which until recently had managed to ride out the economic turmoil sparked by southern Europe's sovereign debt crisis, are feeling the pinch.

German retail sales figures in October were much weaker than expected, falling 2.8% compared with September, and 0.8% year-over-year, providing further evidence that Europe's biggest economy could contract in the fourth quarter after growing just 0.2% in the third.

Consumer spending in France also fell in October, declining by 0.2% for the month and 0.5% year-over-year.

Private forecasters and the OECD are warning that the eurozone economy could contract again in 2013 as governments across the region continue to cut spending.

Related: Europe central banks hold fire, for now

European Central Bank president Mario Draghi acknowledged Friday that the eurozone crisis could last well into next year.

The ECB decided earlier this month to keep interest rates at a record low of 0.75%. It meets again next week but isn't expected to cut rates again until the first quarter of 2013 at the earliest.

However, falling inflation may encourage expectations of a rate cut. Eurozone data released Friday showed price pressures falling sharply in November, with the annual inflation rate dropping to 2.2% from 2.5% in October. The ECB aims for a rate of just below 2.0%.

To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 8:41 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Consumer spending drops as income stalls

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Consumers spent less in October, as income growth stalled.

The Commerce Department reported Friday that consumer spending fell 0.2% after an 0.8% jump in September. It was the first decline in spending since May. Personal income was unchanged after rising 0.4% in September.

Consumer spending accounts for more than two-thirds of the nation's economy, so the pullback could be a worrisome sign.

The spending jump in September had been partly driven by higher gas prices, strong car sales, as well as the introduction of the new iPhone, which sparked a jump in spending on electronics.

But the big increase in spending in September was also accompanied by a drop in the personal savings rate, which is a concern for economists. The savings rate did rise modestly in October though, to 3.4%.

Related: 6 best shopping apps to help you save

Gas prices retreated in October, cutting what consumers needed to spend at the pump. Hurricane Sandy also hit overall retail sales, particularly car sales, at the end of the month. To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 8:46 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Do Not Track is dying

Like most browsers, Firefox includes a Do Not Track feature. But until an agreement is reached between advertisers and privacy advocates, the feature will have no effect.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The tantalizing promise of a single button that prevents ads from tracking your online behavior is fizzling fast.

More than nine months after the Obama administration, digital advertisers, browser makers and privacy advocates agreed in principle to create a "Do Not Track" mechanism for Web browsing, the tool is no closer to becoming a reality than it was in February. In fact, the entire plan is on life support.

The various parties have been sitting around a table every Wednesday -- both virtually and, on six occasions, physically -- trying to reach a consensus on how a Do Not Track button would be implemented.

After months of wrangling, the groups still can't even come to an agreement on what "tracking" means and includes. The advertising industry wants to hang on to the current business model of targeted advertising, which tailors ads to users based on their browsing activity. Privacy advocates and lawmakers believe people should easily be able to opt out of that. The one thing all sides agree on is that they are hopelessly deadlocked.

Privacy advocates accuse the advertising industry of unfairly stalling the process.

"The advertisers have been extraordinarily obstructionist, raising the same issues over and over again, forcing new issues that were not on the agenda, adding new issues that have been closed, and launching personal attacks," said Jonathan Mayer, a Stanford privacy researcher and Do Not Track technology developer who is involved in the negotiations.

"We have made, maybe, inches of progress," he said. "This continues to be a stalemate."

On the flip side, the industry claims that privacy supporters are trying to impose overly restrictive changes that could seriously damage the digital advertising business.

"We have a real concern about using a sledgehammer for a flyswatter problem," said Marc Groman, executive director of the National Advertising Initiative, a coalition of online advertisers. "Do Not Track will have a disproportionate effect on our stakeholders."

The World Wide Web Consortium, colloquially known as the W3C, is moderating this increasingly fractious and seemingly endless debate. In an effort to blast through the impasse, the W3C this week hired Peter Swire, an Ohio State University law professor and a former privacy official for the Obama and Clinton administrations, as the working group's new chair.

W3C's Hail Mary hope is that Swire can quickly build consensus. Currently, most major browsers include a Do Not Track button, but without any agreement on how Do Not Track should work, the button doesn't do anything.

An initial plan to have Do Not Track up and running by end of the year is looking impossible.

Part of the problem is the huge number of stakeholders with competing interests. For instance, smaller advertisers argue that Do Not Track favors large players like Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), AOL (AOL) and Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500), each of which has a vast content network of its own. Even with Do Not Track turned on, those giants will still be able to track users' behavior on their own sites -- just not across the rest of the Web.

Another wrench in the gears came when Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) opted to turn Do Not Track on by default in its latest version of Internet Explorer. That threw negotiations into a tizzy over which default -- "on" or "off" -- best represents a user's intent. (That's the official line. The disagreement is really over whether the advertising industry is still willing to play along with Do Not Track if the default setting is "on.")

"Why is this taking so long? Because people don't want to budge," said Ian Jacobs, spokesman for the W3C. "It's like a budget deficit committee meeting."

The W3C is determined to break the deadlock, and it believes it has a solution -- albeit an undesirable one.

In the agenda for its latest face-to-face meeting, held last month, the group finally admitted that "many issues cannot be resolved in a way that does not raise any objections." So the W3C plans to start holding votes and letting the majority rule.

"We always seek consensus, but when we can't, we'll get votes and make decisions," Jacobs said. "Saying 'I don't like this' is not going to be considered a strong objection. We're not going to be held hostage when a group can't make progress."

But even the W3C acknowledges that all parties will have to voluntarily agree to honor Do Not Track once the negotiations end. If the final decision isn't unanimous, some advertisers and browsers may choose to simply ignore Do Not Track protocols.

That's why some privacy proponents are advocating for a more nuclear option: ad blocking.

"Do Not Track was supposed to be the olive branch. It was the polite solution," said Stanford's Mayer. "If we don't get an agreement, then we'll just start blocking those guys." To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 6:09 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Make your charitable giving go further

Not knowing how their money will be spent causes some people to hold back from giving to charities.

(Money Magazine) -- Most of us feel generous in December, the top month for charitable donations, reports the Atlas of Giving. But regardless of when you give, you want to make sure that the funds are actually used to do real good.

"Not knowing how their money will be spent sometimes holds people back from supporting a charity," says Jason Franklin, who teaches nonprofit management and philanthropy at New York University and is executive director of Bolder Giving, a nonprofit focused on helping Americans give more effectively.

Meanwhile, recent news reports that major charities employ telemarketing firms that eat up more than half of funds raised may not have inspired confidence to open up your wallet.

Use this guide to make sure the maximum amount of your donation is going toward a deserving cause.

Sharpen your focus

A 2012 study from the Chronicle of Philanthropy reports that the median amount American households donate to charity each year is $2,564. That's a nice chunk of change, but not if you're divvying it up among dozens of organizations.

"For every gift, there are fixed costs associated with stewarding and tracking it," adds Patrick Rooney, director of the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. "So the smaller the gift, the larger the percentage that goes to transaction and administrative costs."

Related: Tighten up your holiday spending

Don't want to limit your donations to one or two organizations all year? Franklin suggests using the 50/20/30 rule: Half your giving should be focused on one charity -- the gift you'll spend the most time thinking about. Then set aside 20% for small impulse gifts and the final 30% for institutions you support on a regular basis, like your alma mater or your church.

Get with the new thinking

For the past decade the conventional wisdom has been to look up your preferred organizations' financials on GuideStar.org or CharityNavigator.org and stick with ones that limit their overhead expenses to less than 20% of their budget.

But expense ratios don't tell the whole story -- some nonprofits have higher administrative costs because of the nature of their work, says Fred Setterberg, co-author of "Giving with Confidence: A Guide to Savvy Philanthropy." (Note: Anything above 25% should still raise a red flag, says Franklin.)

Today, organizations that vet charities are increasingly focused on figuring out which ones are doing the best work to support their mission, says Sean Stannard-Stockton, a Burlingame, Calif., financial adviser who specializes in charitable giving.

Two sites can help you suss that out. MyPhilanthropedia.com (recently acquired by GuideStar) pulls together experts to recommend and evaluate charities in 31 different causes. GreatNonprofits.org offers crowd-sourced reviews of the work charities are doing, as told by volunteers, donors, and beneficiaries -- sort of like the Yelp of the nonprofit world.

Also dig into the organization's website yourself to see how it frames its goals: Specificity is important, says Jacob Harold, who formerly led grantmaking for the Hewlett Foundation and is now the CEO of GuideStar.

Related: 10 steps to making a budget

A charity that says it's going to train 10,000 people in East L.A. and ensure that 4,000 will get jobs between now and the end of 2013 is likely to spend your donation more carefully than one that says it's "going to end poverty."

Pay the old-fashioned way

Credit card and other processing fees can eat up as much as 5% of your donation to a charity -- so when you can, write a check or issue one through your bank's online bill-paying system.

A charity you love phones to ask for money? It's best to say no -- the telemarketing firm will get a cut of what you donate. The exception: Telethons that are run by universities or public broadcasters typically don't eat into the funds raised, but it's still best to send a check directly to the organization.

Once you do, get a receipt to deduct contributions. For donations of $250 or more, you also need a note from the charity stating whether goods or services were provided in exchange for the gift. After all, 'tis better to give and receive. To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 6:17 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Drones soar past their military uses

Unmanned flying machines aren't just for tracking down bad guys anymore.

(Fortune) -- The word "drone" probably doesn't make you think "fun" or even "useful." After all, the most familiar unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is the hulking, weaponized, and sinisterly named Predator deployed by the U.S. military. But drones are destined for gentler tasks; they could be making their way into homes as tools and into distressed areas as humanitarian aids. French company Parrot is already selling its high-end toy, the $300 AR.Drone 2.0, to consumers.

Utility

Drone experts imagine do-it-yourselfers tossing a UAV in the back of their trucks alongside their chainsaw and toolbox. UAVs could be used to monitor crops, for example, or by homeowners who want to check rain gutters without climbing on the roof.

Humanitarian

Advanced image processors could scan and identify areas hit by natural disasters, feeding information to relief workers on the ground. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has also promoted research into using UAVs to deliver vaccines to remote populations.

Fun and games

Phone and tablet apps can already pilot drones and allow owners to pit their piloting skills against each other. Cameras embedded into the hulls capture high-definition still photos and videos, getting aerial shots that used to require elaborate equipment.

This story is from the December 3, 2012 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: November 30, 2012: 6:26 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Jobless claims decline as Sandy impact wanes

Written By limadu on Kamis, 29 November 2012 | 21.29

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The number of people filing for unemployment benefits for the first time declined last week, a sign that the impact of Hurricane Sandy on jobs is starting to wane.

The Labor Department reported that 393,000 filed for initial jobless claims during the week, down from the 416,000 who sought help the previous weeks.

The number of those seeking help spiked earlier in the month due to the impact of Hurricane Sandy, as many hourly workers whose employers were forced to close in the wake of the storm filed for help.

Economists believe it will may still take a few more weeks before initial claims fall back to pre-storm levels. In the months before Sandy, the average number of unemployed filing for new claims was about 370,000. Excluding the impact from Sandy, it looks as if initial claims would have continued to hover around that level.

The report also showed 3.3 million people filed claims for their second week or more of jobless benefits during the week ended Nov. 17, down 70,000 from those seeking that extended help the previous week.

The U.S. labor market has been showing signs of improvement in recent months, with other Labor Department reports showing improvement in hiring and the number of job cuts declining.

But the spike in Hurricane-related job losses earlier in the month, while no longer as big a factor in the weekly jobless claims reading, could be reflected in the November jobs report due Dec. 7.

Deutsche Bank said Thursday that the jobless claims reports so far this month is leading to a forecast of only a 25,000 gain in payrolls, which would be the smallest gain of the year, and that unemployment will rise to 8% from 7.9% in October.

"The hurricane impact will be meaningful," said Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist for the bank, in a note to clients.

Related: Unemployment benefits cost: $520 billion

One factor that could cause a new spike in jobless claims in the coming weeks is the closing of Hostess Brands on Nov. 16. About 15,000 of the 18,500 workers at the company likely got their layoff notices within the last week after a bankruptcy judge approved the request on Nov. 21 from the maker of Twinkies and Wonder Bread to start liquidating the company. About 5,000 of those workers had been on strike starting Nov. 9, but they were not eligible for jobless benefits until they lost their jobs. To top of page

First Published: November 29, 2012: 8:42 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Holy car auction Batman! Original Batmobile for sale

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The Batmobile used in the 1960s Batman TV series is expected to go up for auction in January, the Barrett Jackson auto auction house said Thursday.

The car could sell for millions, said Craig Jackson, chief executive of the auction firm.

Some particularly iconic TV and movie cars have gone for very high prices. For example, a highly modified 1964 Aston Martin DB5 used in James Bond films sold $4.6 million in 2010.

But Hollywood cars don't always command such high prices. Often there are multiple versions created for different types of shots and for promotional use, making it hard to to say that one car is definitively "the car."

Unlike most TV show cars, the Batmobile really is a singular creation. While there have been many imitations, this really is the only original.

The Batmobile started life as the Ford Motor Co (F, Fortune 500).'s 1955 Lincoln Futura concept car which, itself, was based on a Lincoln Mark II. Besides its pearl white paint job, the Futura actually looked very much like the Batmobile it would become over a decade later.

Related: Shah of Iran's Plymouth XNR sells for $935,000

Famed car customizer George Barris -- also known for creating the Munster Koach for the The Munsters and the Beverly Hillbillies' car -- was tasked with creating the Batmobile in 1966. With a tight deadline, he decided that modifying the Futura, rather than starting from scratch, was the way to go.

On television the Batmobile's technology allowed it to shoot flames, squirt oil and shoot tire slashers, but the car is not actually designed to do any of that.

Barris has been the sole owner of the Batmobile since he created it for the TV show.

Unlike the Aston Martin's multi-million dollar price tag, Jonathan Klinger, with the collector car insurance firm Hagerty Insurance, thinks the Batmobile will probably sell for a few hundred thousand dollars. The trouble, he said, is that there are so many very good Batmobile replicas around.

The only thing that makes this one unique is that it's the authentic original, but hardly anyone would be able to tell that by looking at it. Very good replicas can sell for under $100,000.

"I could be wrong," said Klinger. "I'll bet George Barris hopes I'm dead wrong."

Related: SRT Viper: A more refined beast

In an interview with CNNMoney, Barris said he has been offered large sums for the car in the past but he's never considered selling before. He agreed to sell this time, he said, because he thought it was time to move the car out of his studio and put it someplace where more people could enjoy it.

Excellent replicas of rare and desirable cars like Plymouth Hemi 'Cudas and Shelby Mustangs often sell for fractions of what real ones sell for, Jackson said.

"It's just a matter of where you put the commas and the decimals," he said. "They all slide over for the real thing." To top of page

First Published: November 29, 2012: 9:04 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

U.S. economy grew 2.7% in third quarter

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The U.S. economy grew faster than previously reported in the third quarter, as businesses built up their inventories and international trade was stronger than expected.

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the nation's economic health, grew at an annual rate of 2.7% from July to September, the Commerce Department said Thursday, faster than the 1.3% rate in the second quarter, and better than originally reported.

The Commerce Department estimates the quarterly GDP figures three times, and Thursday's data marks its second estimate. It had originally reported the economy grew 2% in the third quarter.

Related: World's largest economies by GDP size

The upward revision came mainly from two areas: exports were stronger than expected, growing at a 1.1% annual rate, and businesses built up larger inventories of their products.

But not all parts of the report pointed to a stronger economy.

The American consumer spent less than was initially reported, particularly on gasoline and other energy-related goods. Consumer spending accounts for more than two-thirds of U.S. economic activity, and in the third quarter it grew at a 1.4% annual rate, down from the initial 2% estimate.

Corporate profits rose at a 3.5% annual rate, driven primarily by gains at financial companies. But businesses cut back on their spending during the quarter, particularly on computers, transportation equipment and structures.

Overall, GDP growth below 3% a year is not very encouraging for the job market. One major economic theory suggests that the economy needs to grow around 3% a year to bring unemployment down by one percentage point. The unemployment rate was 7.9% as of October.

Going forward, economists are expecting slower growth in the fourth quarter, due to fiscal cliff fears and the effects of Superstorm Sandy.

"A slowing trend already looks likely in the fourth quarter due to storm disruptions and because business confidence has sunk to its lowest for a year, hit in particular by uncertainty caused by the looming fiscal cliff and ongoing worries about the euro zone crisis," Chris Williamson, chief economist for Markit, wrote in a note to clients.

To top of page

First Published: November 29, 2012: 8:52 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Why 'cheap' stocks aren't always good

The price you pay matters -- pay attention to stock valuations. Cheap isn't always a good buy.

NEW YORK (Money Magazine) -- Remember in the late '90s when Wall Street was so fixated on earnings growth that highfliers like Cisco Systems were coveted despite price/earnings ratios of 100 or more?

Lesson learned: The price you pay for a stock matters. Alas, the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction.

Case in point: Europe. Most money managers think the Continent, mired in recession thanks to its epic debt crisis, will remain stuck in reverse next year and grow at a subpar 2% long after that. They also fear that profits will continue to deteriorate.

Yet a growing chorus believes that European equities are a steal.

That's because at a P/E ratio of 11, they sell for about 50% of what big U.S. equities fetch, more than twice their usual discount.

"European stocks are so cheap they might go up in response to even a half-baked rescue plan," says Doug Ramsey, chief investment officer for the Leuthold Group.

Unfortunately, while there is a strong relationship between current valuations and future performance, a low P/E isn't a foolproof buy signal.

Related: Why old media stocks are on top today

Take 1973. That year the P/E for the S&P 500 index sank from an above-average 19 -- based on 10 years of averaged earnings -- to a historically cheap 13. Yet over the following decade, blue chips posted mediocre annual gains of 6.7%. Factoring in inflation, equities lost value.

By contrast, in 1991, P/Es climbed back to nearly 19. Yet stocks had real annual gains of 15% for the next decade.

The difference?

For starters, between 1973 and 1982, profits for S&P 500 companies grew about 4% a year, well shy of their long-term 6%. From 1991 to 2000, earnings soared at double the historical pace.

Also, in the '70s the Fed was raising interest rates to fight inflation. In the '90s it was cutting them to jump-start growth.

Fast-forward to today: Europe is cheap, but the U.S. economy and profits are expected to grow much faster than the Continent's.

"Valuation has an inherent inability to be a predictor of market action," says James Stack, president of InvesTech Research.

Yes, P/Es offer a clue about how much stocks might rise or fall, but it's earnings and interest rates, or geopolitics and investor psychology, that change the market's direction. "Over valued markets can keep getting more overvalued, and undervalued ones can keep getting cheaper," says Stack.

Related: Tips for investing in stocks

Robert Arnott, chairman of Research Affiliates, contends that valuation is still "the most important tool" investors have, especially the P/E ratio based on 10 years of averaged earnings.

Yet even the man who popularized this metric, Yale economist Robert Shiller, cautions that it's "not a guarantee. If you look at history," he says, "the market is simply hard to predict." To top of page

First Published: November 29, 2012: 6:02 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

AT&T has best 4G network in Consumer Reports' rankings

AT&T's 4G network is smaller than Verizon's, but its 4G service is the smoothest, according to Consumer Reports.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The overall rankings didn't change, but AT&T scored a surprising coup in the annual Consumer Reports survey of the top cell phone service providers.

AT&T, ranked dead last in the customer satisfaction survey for the third straight year, topped all wireless carriers in the magazine's 4G network ratings.

Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500) has by far the largest 4G-LTE network, serving more than 400 markets, compared to just over 100 for AT&T (T, Fortune 500) and more than 40 for Sprint (S, Fortune 500). But AT&T customers reported the fewest 4G-related problems of any carrier, including service interruptions, slow speeds or lack of service.

Still, Verizon once again topped the charts in the overall rankings of national carriers -- and it's pulling away from the rest of the pack. Verizon outscored Sprint by 6 points in Consumer Reports' customer satisfaction ratings, a gap that widened since last year. T-Mobile came in third, trailed slightly by AT&T, which got worst-in-class rankings for value, voice quality and customer support.

A year ago, Sprint trailed Verizon by just a point in the rankings, but the carrier's satisfaction rating fell by a dramatic six points over the course of the year.

What happened? In its survey, Consumer Reports noted that 4G customers are generally more satisfied than those with 3G service. Sprint's significantly smaller 4G could play a role in its customers' lower ratings.

Though 4G customers are generally happier, faster data connections can lead to higher cell phone bills, Consumer Reports pointed out. Verizon and AT&T both recently introduced shared data plans that encourage higher data usage. The nation's two largest carriers have reported that they are making more money on the new plans as customers ramp up their gigabytes.

For many customers, there are other options. Smaller, regional carriers like Consumer Cellular, U.S. Cellular (USM), and Credo all ranked ahead of their larger national rivals in Consumer Reports' survey.

Prepaid carriers Tracfone and Straight Talk also performed better than the national players, winning high marks for both quality and value. Two-thirds of Consumer Reports' survey respondents who switched to prepaid plans said they saved at least $20 a month. To top of page

First Published: November 29, 2012: 6:16 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

British banks may need more capital

The Bank of England orders immediate review of capital levels at British banks

LONDON (CNNMoney) -- British banks may not have enough capital to absorb future losses while supporting growth in the economy, the Bank of England warned Thursday.

The central bank, which takes on the responsibility of regulating U.K. banks from the Financial Services Authority (FSA) next year, said an urgent review of capital adequacy was necessary.

"The problem is manageable, and is already understood at least in part by markets," said BoE Governor Mervyn King. "But it does warrant immediate attention."

In its Financial Stability Report, the BoE said capital exceeded the minimum required. But the capital could be overstated because banks may be underestimating future losses, arising from the eurozone for example, as well as taking an overly optimistic view of risk on their books and not recognizing the full cost of past misconduct.

Related: Growing cost of HSBC's laundry list

Fines, penalties and compensation linked to the manipulation of the benchmark Libor lending rate, misleading customers about payment protection insurance and settlements in other cases have already cost Britain's banks billions of dollars.

King leaves office next year, to be replaced by Canada's central bank governor, Mark Carney. Carney will take on a much broader mandate, adding financial regulation to the bank's traditional monetary policy focus.

The British economy emerged from recession in the third quarter, thanks in part to spending on the London Olympics, but may contract again in the fourth due to slowing activity in the eurozone.

The BoE said the underlying picture for global growth remained weak, and it was therefore vital that banks move quickly to ensure they have a solid basis to support the economy.

Related: OECD warns of further weakness in Europe

Eurozone risks were still considerable, it added.

"While the immediate risks have reduced, there remains a possibility of disorderly outcomes, which if they occurred would have major implications for U.K. financial stability," it said.

Banks have reduced their exposure to the sovereign debt crisis in the weakest eurozone countries but continue to have significant links to non-bank businesses in the region.

The FSA will begin its review immediately.

If capital buffers needed to be strengthened as a consequence, the FSA "should ensure that the firms either raise capital or take steps to restructure their business and balance sheets in ways that do not hinder lending to the real economy," the BoE said.

To top of page

First Published: November 29, 2012: 7:24 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

What is 'Fix the Debt?'

Written By limadu on Rabu, 28 November 2012 | 21.29

Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles founded Fix the Debt, and Honeywell CEO David Cote has lent his support to the effort.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The election may be over. But there's a "Campaign to Fix the Debt" backed by millions of dollars that's well under way and gaining a voice in Washington.

And on Wednesday, some of its members will be meeting with leaders from both parties on Capitol Hill as lawmakers struggle with a way to avert the fiscal cliff.

The group's stated mission is to urge "Washington to agree to comprehensive debt reform that avoids the fiscal cliff and puts the long-term U.S. debt load on a gradual path of reduction."

Although it is a nonpartisan effort, it has come under partisan fire from different directions.

The campaign was founded by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson -- the co-chairmen of President Obama's deficit-reduction commission in 2010.

Related: 8 things that could kill a deal

It recently launched a print, digital and outdoor advertising campaign, and has established local chapters in nine states.

The campaign has built up a $42 million "war chest" thanks to contributions from businesses, foundations and individuals. Among them is billionaire investor Peter G. Peterson, who has earmarked much of his wealth to build awareness of the country's long-term fiscal problems.

The campaign says it isn't advocating for any particular plan, but it supports a set of "core principles" that it believes a successful debt-reduction plan must satisfy.

For starters, such a plan must garner bipartisan support. It should reduce the country's debt gradually in a way that supports economic growth and protects the vulnerable. And it must make changes across the budget.

Among those changes, the campaign states that it should "reform Medicare and Medicaid, improve efficiency in the overall health care system, and limit future cost growth." It should make Social Security solvent. And it should include comprehensive tax reform that "broadens the base, lowers rates, raises revenues, and reduces the deficit."

The campaign's bipartisan steering committee is made up of former lawmakers, governors, deficit hawks, business people and a former head of the World Bank.

An online citizens' petition on the group's website has more than 300,000 signatures -- a large number but still well below the stated goal of 10 million.

But the most high-profile part of the campaign -- and the one that has been sharply criticized by the left -- is its CEO fiscal leadership council, which includes some of the biggest names in corporate America.

In October they went public with their backing of the campaign's core principles.

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman counts the group among what he calls "deficit scolds" and said it's "campaigning for cuts to Social Security and Medicare, even while making lower tax rates a 'core principle.'"

The Institute for Policy Studies, a longtime critic of CEO pay and economic inequality, has since put out two publications impugning the motives of those on the council.

"These CEOs paint a stark picture of hypocrisy," said Scott Klinger, a co-author of one of the reports said in a statement. "They're simply taking advantage of the so-called 'fiscal cliff' to push the same old agenda of more corporate tax breaks while shifting costs onto the poor and elderly."

Jon Romano, a Fix the Debt spokesperson, said the campaign's supporters are willing to do their part to help policymakers reach a consensus on what are difficult issues.

"It's unfortunate some are engaging in the kinds of divisive attacks that contribute to the gridlock the campaign is trying to break. It's time for constructive dialogue," Romano said.

At the same time, the CEOs are not exactly getting a ton of love from other business groups, some of which don't share their view that more tax revenue should be raised to help reduce deficits.

But they are getting a hearing inside the Beltway. Last week, some of the council's CEOs met with Obama, who also has met with labor leaders, small business owners and other fiscal cliff stakeholders. This week, other members of the CEO council are meeting with Obama, as well as with Republican and Democratic leaders in the House.

At the same time, the campaign's leaders -- including Bowles and Maya MacGuineas, president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget -- met this week with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew and other senior administration officials who will be involved in the fiscal cliff negotiations. To top of page

First Published: November 28, 2012: 7:02 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Spanish bank bailout gets go-ahead

Bankia is one of four Spanish banks to get the green light for a eurozone bailout

LONDON (CNNMoney) -- The European Commission has approved Spain's plans to restructure four of its weakest banks, clearing the way for them to receive nearly €37 billion in fresh capital from the eurozone's bailout fund.

All four banks were nationalized to prevent them collapsing after Spain's property bubble burst, leaving them facing massive losses on their loan books.

The bailout should allow three lenders - BFA/Bankia, NCG Banco and Catalunya Banc -- to become viable in the long term without continued state support, the Commission said. Their balance sheets will be reduced by 60% by 2017.

The fourth, Banco de Valencia, will be sold to CaixaBank and will cease to operate independently.

"Our objective is to restore the viability of banks receiving aid so that they are able to function without public support in the future," said European Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia. "Restoring a healthier financial sector capable of financing the real economy is indispensable for economic recovery in Spain."

Related: Spanish economy shrinks again

Independent stress tests conducted on the Spanish banking sector earlier this year identified a capital hole of about €59 billion.

Spain's eurozone partners have agreed to provide up to €100 billion from the currency area's permanent bailout fund -- the European Stability Mechanism -- but only once restructuring plans are submitted and approved.

The overhaul requires the banks to cease lending to the real estate sector, limit their activities in wholesale funding, and focus on providing services to retail clients and small businesses. Real estate assets are being transferred to a "bad bank".

Spain has committed to privatize NCG and Catalunya Banc before the end of the five-year restructuring period. BFA/Bankia, Spain's biggest bank, and Catalunya will also sell their fixed-income trading businesses.

Fixing Spain's banking crisis is essential to setting the eurozone's fourth largest economy on the road to recovery. The country is suffering its second recession in three years and unemployment has hit 25%.

Related: Service sector adds to eurozone gloom

Standard & Poor's cut its rating on Spain last month, citing the risk of social discontent and rising tensions between the central government and Spain's semi-autonomous regions.

Weekend elections in Catalonia resulted in a majority for parties that support independence.

The European Commission is expected to decide next month on restructuring plans for a second group of Spanish banks -- Banco Mare Nostrum, Banco Caja 3, Liberbank and Ceiss, which also failed the stress tests.

Spain has held off joining Greece, Ireland and Portugal in requesting a full-blown bailout, but some analysts believe it is only a matter of time. A "doom loop" of spending cuts and weaker-than-expected growth may make it impossible for Spain to meet its budget targets.

The yields on Spain's 10-year bond fell to around 5.4%, and the spread to the benchmark German bond narrowed, as investors welcomed the bank bailout news. The yield touched 7.5% earlier this year, but has fallen back sharply since the European Central Bank announced it was ready to buy bonds of troubled eurozone nations provided they request a bailout. To top of page

First Published: November 28, 2012: 7:32 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Costco special dividend to beat fiscal cliff

Costco will pay $3 billion in a special dividend next month.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Costco Wholesale, the warehouse merchant, announced Wednesday that it will pay a special $3 billion dividend before year's end, saving shareholders from a big bite should taxes rise due to the fiscal cliff.

The company said the $7-a-share payment is possible due to its strong balance sheet and its good access to capital. The payment will be in addition to the regular 27.5 cent a share dividend that will be paid on Nov. 30.

The special dividend will be paid Dec. 18 to shareholders of record on Dec. 10. That will allow investors to pay the lower 15% tax rate currently in effect on dividends. With taxes set to rise on Jan. 1 as part of the fiscal cliff, the rate paid on the dividend could more than double for many high income taxpayers.

Related: Companies speeding up dividend payments

Numerous companies, including Costco rival Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, Fortune 500), have moved dividend payments normally made in January into December. But in Wal-Mart's case, it was the regular dividend being moved, not a special dividend being added.

Shares of Costco (COST, Fortune 500) rose 4.7% in premarket trading on the news.

Related: Record Black Friday shopping

The company also announced strong sales for November and the just completed quarter, periods that included the Black Friday weekend that kicks off the holiday shopping period.

Sales at stores open at least a year, a closely watched retail measure known as same-store sales, rose 6% at its U.S. stores for both the four-week and the 12-week periods ended Nov. 25, when the effect of higher gas prices were excluded. Total sales rose 9% to $8.15 billion in the four weeks ending Nov 25.

The National Retail Federation estimates that total U.S. shopping during the four-day holiday weekend rose 13% from a year ago, to a record $59.1 billion. To top of page

First Published: November 28, 2012: 7:50 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Bellator: Bjorn Rebney's fight club

Bellator's founder Bjorn Rebney

(Fortune) -- What does sports law have to do with cage fighting? Not a whole lot -- but for Bjorn Rebney, one was his job, the other his passion.

Rebney, 46, went to Ohio University on a football scholarship, then to law school. He spent a few years doing construction-defect litigation but hated it. He soon found a position with sports-law group Steinberg Moorad & Dunn and began arranging deals for athletes like boxer Oscar De La Hoya.

A few years later Sugar Ray Leonard approached SMD looking to recast his public image. In 1998, Rebney left Steinberg to create Sugar Ray Leonard Boxing, a promotion company jointly owned with Leonard. Still, much like his stretch in insurance law, Rebney wasn't in love with his work. "I was never a boxing guy," he says.

Rebney's true passion was MMA (mixed martial arts), an under-the-radar fighting sport. "As soon as that bell rings," he says, "the fighters are shaking hands. They've got black eyes, they're busted up, bruised everywhere, and yet they're laughing together after the fight. I think they're the most heroic athletes on the face of the earth."

More Second Acts: From rock and roll to real estate

There was one leading MMA promoter, UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship), but Rebney believed there was a flaw in its matchmaking structure: Fights are arranged behind closed doors, as opposed to winners advancing in a tournament format. So he left Leonard to start something from scratch: a sports entertainment entity that would sign MMA fighters, set up live events, and produce them for television. Taking on UFC was a major risk -- other competitors like Affliction and IFL folded -- but Rebney knew how to make deals, and he knew MMA.

The road to starting Bellator (Latin for "warrior") was arduous. Rebney says he "feverishly searched for capital" and "got on every single cheap Southwest flight I could find" to talk with fighters. He made his pitch 62 times in 14 months. He spent all his savings and put a second, then a third mortgage on his house.

More Second Acts: How a bra seller found her fit

In 2008, Rebney got lucky: The investor he called at Connecticut hedge fund Plainfield Asset Management was an MMA nut who had been training in the sport since 2004. Thirty minutes into Rebney's pitch, VP Tim Danaher told him to fly right to New York. Plainfield invested in the mid-tens of millions to finance Bellator's first season, in 2009.

Today Bellator is the world's second-largest MMA promoter, though still far behind UFC, which has been valued at nearly $2 billion and is majority-owned by Zuffa, a Las Vegas MMA company. In 2011, Viacom (VIA) purchased a controlling interest in Bellator. In January all of Bellator's programming will move to Viacom's Spike Network, replacing UFC, which moved to Fox. Danaher, who left Plainfield in 2010 to become Bellator's president and COO, says Rebney's "a visionary." A happy one, finally.

Rebney's advice for making the move

Have a thick skin. So many investors told Rebney no. "I have a very thick skin, but time after time I'd make the pitch and could tell that it was going nowhere. I kept at it."

Enlist your partner. Rebney's wife didn't like MMA. Then he took her to a live event. "The excitement, the adrenaline, the crowd -- she took to it," he says. "Now she'll watch, and thank God I have her."

Do what you love. "I'm getting paid to do what I used to pay to do," marvels Rebney. "I still can't believe I even get to walk into the locker room."

This story is from the December 3, 2012 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: November 28, 2012: 6:25 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Hawaii: No paradise for the megabanks

For the nation's 10 biggest banks, Hawaii is no paradise.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The sunshine and gorgeous beaches of Hawaii may attract millions of tourists to its islands every year, but the nation's largest banks steer clear of the state.

While the ten biggest banks in the country -- including Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), Citi (C, Fortune 500), Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) -- have plenty of ATMs and branches in most states, that's not the case in Hawaii. In fact, Hawaii is the only state in the country where none of these megabanks have a retail presence.

A combination of factors have kept these large banks at bay, including Hawaii's distance from the mainland, its relatively small population, high real estate costs and stiff local competition, say banking analysts.

"It's the kind of place you'd want to get to go on a business trip to ... but it's not an attractive market from the perspective of having to manage [a national bank]," said Brian Riley, senior research director at consulting firm TowerGroup.

Thousands of miles away (and pricey): More than 2,000 miles from Los Angeles, Hawaii is the least accessible state for banks to do business in, said Riley.

It has its own time zone and is five or six hours behind the East Coast, so national banks would need to hire additional employees to staff their national call centers during Hawaii's business hours if they don't already operate 24 hours a day. They would also need to transport equipment, like ATM machines, tacking on added costs.

Even if a bank decided to bridge the time and distance gap, the potential payoff would likely be small. With a population of 1.4 million people, Hawaii is a miniscule market compared to a state like New York, which has more than 19 million people.

Related: Who are the unbanked?

"We are a very small market in the grand scheme of things and our remoteness probably also detracts from interest from the large banks on the mainland," said Edward Pei, executive director of the Hawaii Bankers Association.

One big national bank, which asked to remain anonymous, agreed that it would simply be too expensive to operate in such a remote area.

Real estate would also be no small expense. The median commercial property price in Hawaii is $448 per square foot -- more than triple the national median of $141, according to Real Capital Analytics. And land is so limited to begin with that storefront space in prime locations is especially hard to come by, said Pei.

Local banks rule: Any bank that dares enter Hawaii will face stiff competition from the banks that have already staked their claim. First Hawaiian Bank, a subsidiary of BNP Paribas since 2001, and Bank of Hawaii have gained about 71% of the market share since opening their doors in the 1800s. And many customers have gained a sense of loyalty to these banks over the decades, said Pei.

"Hawaii consumers do seem to have a higher degree of loyalty to their financial institution, which makes it more difficult for out-of-state banks to enter the market," Pei said.

While Hawaii's biggest local banks would likely be tough competitors, smaller banks and credit unions would risk going out of business altogether. Consumers, however, would likely benefit from the added competition, said Eugene Tian, chief economist at the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism.

Related: Bank customers -- you're being tracked

"Competition is always good for consumers because they will have more choices -- which usually leads to lower prices," said Tian.

In 1992, Bank of America became the first major national bank to make a foray into the state when it purchased Honolulu Federal Savings & Loan. While savings and loans often offer many of the same banking services as traditional banks, like savings and checking accounts, they are required to hold a certain percentage of their assets in mortgage loans and are limited in the business lending they can do.

Bank of America intended to convert HonFed into a commercial bank, but the transition proved too challenging and it couldn't compete with Hawaii's other local banks, said Pei. So after a five-year tenure -- during which HonFed's assets declined substantially -- it sold its branches to another Hawaiian bank, he said. Bank of America said it does have one mortgage loan office in Hawaii.

Now, more than a decade later, Bank of America says it is investing in banking centers "where there's a high-growth opportunity and where it makes the most sense and where we know our customers bank," according to spokeswoman Tara Burke. The local market and costs of operation are among the factors it considers.

Related: Which is the best bank in America?

For states where Bank of America doesn't have a presence, Burke said there are mobile and online banking platforms that customers anywhere in the country can use.

Other banks said their branches have always been limited to certain geographical regions that simply don't include Hawaii. PNC, for example, said its branches are concentrated in the eastern United States, while HSBC places branches in "internationally connected urban markets" like New York City, Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Many banks have even been shedding branches as they cut costs and focus on boosting their online and mobile presence, so there would need to be a very compelling reason for a bank to open a new brick and mortar branch anywhere -- especially in a place where they haven't had a presence before, said David Albertazzi, a senior analyst at Aite Group.

"In terms of retail branch expansion, it's not a time to experiment, and [Hawaii] is viewed as a niche market for larger banks," he said. To top of page

First Published: November 28, 2012: 6:05 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

What is 'Fix the Debt?'

Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles founded Fix the Debt, and Honeywell CEO David Cote has lent his support to the effort.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The election may be over. But there's a "Campaign to Fix the Debt" backed by millions of dollars that's well under way and gaining a voice in Washington.

And on Wednesday, some of its members will be meeting with leaders from both parties on Capitol Hill as lawmakers struggle with a way to avert the fiscal cliff.

The group's stated mission is to urge "Washington to agree to comprehensive debt reform that avoids the fiscal cliff and puts the long-term U.S. debt load on a gradual path of reduction."

Although it is a nonpartisan effort, it has come under partisan fire from different directions.

The campaign was founded by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson -- the co-chairmen of President Obama's deficit-reduction commission in 2010.

Related: 8 things that could kill a deal

It recently launched a print, digital and outdoor advertising campaign, and has established local chapters in nine states.

The campaign has built up a $42 million "war chest" thanks to contributions from businesses, foundations and individuals. Among them is billionaire investor Peter G. Peterson, who has earmarked much of his wealth to build awareness of the country's long-term fiscal problems.

The campaign says it isn't advocating for any particular plan, but it supports a set of "core principles" that it believes a successful debt-reduction plan must satisfy.

For starters, such a plan must garner bipartisan support. It should reduce the country's debt gradually in a way that supports economic growth and protects the vulnerable. And it must make changes across the budget.

Among those changes, the campaign states that it should "reform Medicare and Medicaid, improve efficiency in the overall health care system, and limit future cost growth." It should make Social Security solvent. And it should include comprehensive tax reform that "broadens the base, lowers rates, raises revenues, and reduces the deficit."

The campaign's bipartisan steering committee is made up of former lawmakers, governors, deficit hawks, business people and a former head of the World Bank.

An online citizens' petition on the group's website has more than 300,000 signatures -- a large number but still well below the stated goal of 10 million.

But the most high-profile part of the campaign -- and the one that has been sharply criticized by the left -- is its CEO fiscal leadership council, which includes some of the biggest names in corporate America.

In October they went public with their backing of the campaign's core principles.

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman counts the group among what he calls "deficit scolds" and said it's "campaigning for cuts to Social Security and Medicare, even while making lower tax rates a 'core principle.'"

The Institute for Policy Studies, a longtime critic of CEO pay and economic inequality, has since put out two publications impugning the motives of those on the council.

"These CEOs paint a stark picture of hypocrisy," said Scott Klinger, a co-author of one of the reports said in a statement. "They're simply taking advantage of the so-called 'fiscal cliff' to push the same old agenda of more corporate tax breaks while shifting costs onto the poor and elderly."

Jon Romano, a Fix the Debt spokesperson, said the campaign's supporters are willing to do their part to help policymakers reach a consensus on what are difficult issues.

"It's unfortunate some are engaging in the kinds of divisive attacks that contribute to the gridlock the campaign is trying to break. It's time for constructive dialogue," Romano said.

At the same time, the CEOs are not exactly getting a ton of love from other business groups, some of which don't share their view that more tax revenue should be raised to help reduce deficits.

But they are getting a hearing inside the Beltway. Last week, some of the council's CEOs met with Obama, who also has met with labor leaders, small business owners and other fiscal cliff stakeholders. This week, other members of the CEO council are meeting with Obama, as well as with Republican and Democratic leaders in the House.

At the same time, the campaign's leaders -- including Bowles and Maya MacGuineas, president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget -- met this week with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew and other senior administration officials who will be involved in the fiscal cliff negotiations. To top of page

First Published: November 28, 2012: 7:02 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Companies speeding up dividend payments

Written By limadu on Selasa, 27 November 2012 | 21.29

Wal-Mart announced recently that it would pay out its fourth-quarter dividend early to help ease investors' worries about the fiscal cliff.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- While investors brace for higher tax rates on dividend payments next year, a few companies have taken steps to soften the blow with early payouts.

Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) became one of the largest companies to take action recently. The world's top retailer said last week that it planned to pay its fourth-quarter dividend in late 2012, rather than early 2013.

The move is a preemptive strike against potentially higher tax rates on income from stock dividends, as the debate in Washington over the fiscal cliff remains unresolved.

Under the automatic tax hikes and federal spending cuts set to take effect Jan. 1, the rate at which dividend payments are taxed could more than double for some high-income taxpayers. Dividends are currently taxed at a rate of 15%.

"There are complex fiscal and federal tax rate issues that may not be resolved in the next few weeks, despite the ongoing good faith negotiations between the administration and Congress to resolve details related to the fiscal cliff," Wal-Mart said in a statement. "In light of this uncertainty, the board determined that moving our dividend payment up by a few days to 2012 was in the best interests of our shareholders."

Wal-Mart isn't alone.

Hot Topic (HOTT), a youth-oriented apparel company, said earlier this month that it would accelerate its quarterly dividend payment "to allow shareholders to benefit from the lower dividend tax rate that is set to expire December 31, 2012."

Related: 8 things that could kill a fiscal cliff deal

The Buckle (BKE), another clothing company, also moved up its fourth-quarter dividend payment this month, and announced a $4.50 per share special cash dividend for long-term shareholders to be paid on Dec. 21.

And department store operator Dillards (DDS, Fortune 500), which normally pays its fourth-quarter dividend in January, said Monday that it would pay that dividend, along with a special one-time $5 cash dividend, on Dec. 7.

All four companies were originally set to pay dividends in January, when the fiscal year ends for many retailers.

While most experts say lawmakers and the White House will reach a compromise, many investors expect taxes on dividend payments to go up regardless of how the fiscal cliff is resolved, said Brian Gendreau, market strategist at Cetera Financial.

"I'm not surprised this is happening," said Gendreau, who is also a professor of finance at the University of Florida. "It would make sense for companies to cut investors a break and accelerate dividend payments."

Related: Wall Street bracing for capital gains tax hikes

For companies, making dividend payments a few days ahead of schedule would probably not involve any extra expense, said Gendreau. But the strategy is "not a big deal" for shareholders since it only provides a tax break on one dividend payment, he added.

At least one major retailer is bucking the trend and standing pat.

Best Buy (BBY, Fortune 500) said last week that its regular quarterly dividend would be paid on Jan. 2, after the tax rates are expected to go up. A spokesman said Monday that Best Buy currently has no plans to change its dividend pay date.

Overall, higher taxes have not diminished demand for dividend-paying stocks and investors do not appear ready to abandon the steady stream of income they provide.

"It's hard to look at historical data and concluded that higher tax rates on dividends have been a disaster," said Gendreau.

To top of page

First Published: November 27, 2012: 8:05 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Independent farms rake in millions

Some 50,000 farms bring in over a million dollars a year, thanks largely to their size. Smaller farms, on the other hand, are struggling.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The American farmer might not be as poor as you think.

Despite the common notion that family farms have fallen on tough times and been pushed out by big agribusinesses, tens of thousands of families in the United States actually run multi-million dollar farming operations that produce the majority of the nation's food.

While million-dollar independent farms aren't the norm -- there are many times more small farms that struggle to make ends meet -- these slightly larger farms have been able to take advantage of their size, more advanced technologies and the recent commodity boom to become very successful small businesses.

"Times have been pretty good," said Matt Schuiteman, who has 2,400 hogs and farms 2,500 acres in northwest Iowa with the help of his sons and a few hired hands. "We've been dealing with an environment where the price of all commodities has been going up."

Schuiteman's farm is one of over 50,000 nationwide that have gross sales of over a million dollars a year, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.

Lumping in farms with sales of over $250,000 a year, and these so called large-scale commercial farms represent just 10% of the country's farms but account for 82% of its overall food production.

"People, on average, that are running large commercial farms are making substantial amounts of money," said Jim MacDonald, an economist at USDA, noting their the average household income is over $200,000 a year.

Related: Cash-strapped farmers feed candy to cows

What makes them so successful?

The biggest driver of their income is their ability to take advantage of their larger size. A farm with 300 dairy cows will produce ten times as much milk as a farm with 30 cows. But the barn to house those extra cows isn't ten times as expensive, nor is the equipment or the laborers to do the work. The payoff for more land is well worth the expense.

And these large independent farmers often have the means to supply the big food companies like Tyson Foods (TSN, Fortune 500) or Dole (DOLE, Fortune 500) with their raw product.

Plus, farm subsidies from the federal government, which are doled out largely based on the output of the farm, are another advantage. Subsidies, which total about $14 billion a year, represent about about 5% of the gross cash income for all farms, according to USDA.

Large farmers also have the capital to put down on new technologies that smaller farmers can't afford, like GPS-guided tractors that drive themselves (and save fuel) and computer programs that monitor the health and productivity of livestock. They're often more savvy at using hedging strategies to protect against future uncertainties.

"I call it an information technology gap," said David Miller, an economist at the Iowa Farm Bureau who also has a 350-acre corn and soybean farm outside Des Moines.

With sales of about $200,000 a year and profits of about $50,000, Miller considers himself on the borderline between large and small operator. He makes decent money, but his tractor is 20 years old and does not have GPS.

It also helps that he farms corn and soybeans in Iowa -- two crops that are in strong demand in China and elsewhere.

Related: Feds offer help to drought-stricken farmers

Things are very different for Clark Hinsdale, a dairy farmer in northern Vermont.

With 300 cows and sales that usually top a million dollars a year, Hinsdale has a large commercial farm. But with the high price of corn to feed the cows and gasoline for the tractors, turning a profit has still been tough.

"Grain prices have virtually doubled," he said. "I think I'll lose money this year."

It's even harder for many of his neighbors.

The Northeast is home to many smaller commercial farms. These are the 30-cow, 200-acre operations that many consider "traditional farms." There are about three times as many of these smaller farms nationwide as there are the large farms.

Most of these farmers can no longer support themselves by working the farm alone. The average farm income for this group is about $8,000 a year, according to USDA. As a result, many have at least one family member take a job outside the farm as a primary means of income.

But even though they may not be money machines, the farming lifestyle is still attractive for a lot of people.

"We don't need the big pickup and the fancy tractor," said one Vermont dairy farmer. "We do it because we enjoy it." To top of page

First Published: November 27, 2012: 8:28 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Home prices: Biggest rise in more than 2 years

Home prices are up for the 2nd straight quarter, the biggest year-over-year increase in more than two years.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- In another sign of a housing market rebound, home prices posted the biggest percentage gain in more than two years in the third quarter, according to the closely followed S&P/Case-Shiller index.

The 3.6% increase from a year earlier is more than three times the rise in the previous quarter and was the biggest jump in prices since the second quarter of 2010. But that 2010 rise was much more of a temporary blip caused by a homebuyer's tax credit of up to $8,000 on homes purchased in late 2009 and early 2010.

Related: Most affordable cities for home buyers

This latest rise comes as the housing market has shown numerous other signs of recovery in recent months. The rebound is spurred by a combination of record low mortgage rates, an improving jobs market and a drop in foreclosures to a five-year low, reducing the supply of distressed homes available. There is also a tighter supply of both new and previously owned homes on the market.

The improvement in housing market fundamentals have helped to lift the pace of both home sales and home building.

Related: Housing is indeed heading higher

The latest rise in the Case-Shiller index was the second straight quarter of year-over-year improvement, while the monthly annual reading has climbed for four months in a row.

Home prices are now back to where they were in early 2003, before the housing bubble inflated over the next three years before bursting. Even with the recent gain, the index is down 28.6% from the peak level reached the first quarter of 2006. To top of page

First Published: November 27, 2012: 9:00 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Why old media stocks are on top today

Stocks of traditional news and entertainment companies are besting new media upstarts.

NEW YORK (Money Magazine) -- Big media companies were supposed to die outright along with the old tube TV set.

At least that was the thinking a few years ago as up-and-comers Netflix (NFLX) and Hulu let you bypass commercials, and Facebook (FB) and YouTube made it possible to create and share your own material.

Given that, the recent performance of old- vs. new-media stocks might surprise you.

This year the legacy players have shot up 34%, more than twice the gain of the S&P 500. Yet Facebook has fallen 45% since it went public in May. Why are the old guys ahead?

In short, Americans still like to watch television, especially live sporting events and buzzed-about series. Average time in front of the TV is up since 2003, from 2.6 hours a day to 2.8, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

"TV-bypass is not a mainstream issue," says Bill Nygren, a portfolio manager at Oakmark Funds, who invests in several media stocks.

Related: 14 Money heroes: Their best financial advice

What's more, even as more consumers watch shows online, traditional media are finding ways to earn money off that shift by creating live streaming tools and cutting deals with Netflix and Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500). Social media firms, on the other hand, are still struggling to figure out a profitable business model.

Big-media stocks have gotten pricey, with the sector trading at 14.6 times forecast earnings for the next 12 months, compared with 13.5 for the S&P 500.

The good news is that for the strongest players, earnings are expected to grow faster than the S&P's in the coming years. So stick to these areas for growth worth the price.

Hook onto the cables

Cable-TV subscriptions are dropping off. But a high-speed connection has become a crucial service that consumers are willing to pay up for, says Ann Miletti, a senior portfolio manager at Wells Fargo Advantage Funds.

Broadband subs are as much as 110% more profitable than TV-only customers. That should be a boon to the two largest cable companies, Comcast (CMCSA) and Time Warner Cable (TWC, Fortune 500). "Cable has proven to be flexible," says Miletti.

Also, with the high-speed cable infrastructure largely in place, broadband now generates a lot of cash. This year Comcast raised its dividend 44% and announced a plan to repurchase $6.5 billion in stock. Time Warner Cable raised its payout 17% and announced a $4 billion buyback.

At these two cable giants, those payouts have room to grow. Both firms spend less than 40% of their cash on dividends, far less than the 69% that competitor Cablevision (CVC, Fortune 500) spends.

Own in-demand networks

To cash in on the majority of Americans who still watch TV, favor broadcasters with must-have content.

As the owner of the most popular cable channel, ESPN, Disney (DIS, Fortune 500) has pricing clout with the satellite and cable companies that air the sports network. Through 2017, price hikes for ESPN and other Disney channels could boost that fee revenue by 7.6% a year, reports Credit Suisse. Another edge: Two-thirds of Disney's TV revenue comes from fees, not often-unpredictable ad sales.

Traditional broadcast networks are thought of as the industry laggards: too dependent on ads, audiences shrinking.

CBS (CBS, Fortune 500), a true pure play, is off 13% since the start of a disappointing fall TV season. But therein lies an opportunity. CBS leads its peers in potential syndication deals and has nine of the top 20 shows.

Related: Tips for investing in stocks

"The value of broadcast is enormous," says David Bank, equity research analyst at RBC Capital Markets. CBS is cashing in on that value as broadcasters are collecting more in cable and satellite fees. In 2011, CBS earned 33 cents a subscriber per month. Analysts expect that figure to top $1 in five years.

Spread your bets

If you don't want to make a bet on a single stock, diversify with a fund that invests in the sector. Fidelity Select Multimedia (FBMPX) is a good option. To get a boost from global growth, try T. Rowe Price Media & Telecommunications (PRMTX), which has 19% of its portfolio overseas. To top of page

First Published: November 27, 2012: 5:30 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Adam Bain: Twitter's adman delivers

Adam Bain at Twitter's San Francisco headquarters

(Fortune) -- Moments after Vice President Joe Biden called Paul Ryan's foreign-policy comments "a bunch of malarkey" during the Oct. 11 vice presidential debate, the Obama campaign bid on the trending term "malarkey" on Twitter. Users seized on the old barb, generating tens of thousands of messages tagged #malarkey, which created a commercial boomlet, complete with T-shirts and bumper stickers.

That is the kind of thing that really gets Adam Bain going. As it should: Twitter's president of global revenue is responsible for the growing array of advertising tools that make moments like these a profit center.

Bain, 39, started his career in news at one of the first regional city guides, Cleveland.com, and then spent two years as a web producer at the Los Angeles Times before he joined News Corp. (NWSA, Fortune 500) in 1999. An affable sales executive, he rose to become president of the Fox Audience Network, a division that included one of the largest digital advertising networks and was responsible for making money from properties like MySpace.

MORE: 19 most powerful names on Twitter

When Twitter CEO Dick Costolo recruited Bain in August 2010, the microblogging platform was the black sheep of social media sites. While LinkedIn (LNKD) and Facebook were building robust advertising engines in preparation for their much-anticipated initial public offerings, Twitter had a $3.7 billion valuation but no obvious business model.

Bain eschewed banner ads in favor of messages that showed up directly in the stream of tweets. Pundits wondered whether users would rebel, but it worked. Says Bain: "In 2011 the most retweeted tweet of the year actually came from a marketer itself." (It was a Wendy's tweet aimed at charities.)

With 140 million active users, Twitter has now become a staple for advertisers. It is expected to pull in $288 million in ad revenue this year, according to eMarketer, a 107% jump over 2011, and is now valued at $8 billion. What's more, the company launched mobile advertising in February and already brings in more revenue from that than from desktop users. "Even though Twitter's usage is way below what Facebook has, the company has been able to attract a lot of big brands," says eMarketer analyst Debra Aho Williamson. She credits Bain and his 250-person team.

Next up? Bain has a self-service tool for small businesses in the works, but as with the company's slow-to-emerge ad products, he is taking his time to learn from competitors before releasing it widely. By watching other companies struggle, Bain calculates Twitter will benefit. That's likely to be the strategy for an initial public offering as well: It's not expected before 2014.

This story is from the December 3, 2012 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: November 27, 2012: 5:39 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stocks: Choppy trading ahead

Click on chart for more premarket data.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Stocks could get a lift from the latest deal aimed at fixing Europe's debt crisis, although that could be offset by contentious fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington.

U.S. stock futures were mixed Tuesday, after Greece reached a deal with eurozone leaders over its debt.

Eurozone finance ministers and the International Monetary Fund announced late Monday they had reached an agreement that moves Greece closer to receiving a massive bailout payment. The deal includes lower interest rates for Greece, a debt buyback and more time for the debt-laden country to repay its rescue loans.

But the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development warned early Tuesday that Europe's worsening economy next year will slow U.S. growth more than previously forecast.

Europe's Debt Crisis

European markets rose in morning trading, with Britain's FTSE 100 up 0.4%, Germany's DAX rose 0.5% and France's CAC 40 added 0.3%.

Meanwhile, Asian markets ended mixed. The Shanghai Composite lost 1.2%, while the Hang Seng in Hong Kong ended up about 0.2% and Japan's Nikkei rose 0.4%.

Fear & Greed Index

On the domestic front, investors will continue to keep an eye on economic negotiations in Washington. With Congress back in session, lawmakers are under pressure to reach a deal with the White House before the end of the year in order to avoid falling over the fiscal cliff.

The U.S. economy will also be in focus Tuesday, with reports on consumer confidence, housing and manufacturing due out in the morning.

A report on durable goods is due before the bell, with economists from Briefing.com expecting a slight decline for October.

The Case-Shiller 20-city index will be released at 9 a.m. ET. Analysts expect that the average home price in these markets increased 3.1% in September, up from 2% the month before.

Related: Most affordable cities for homebuying

At 10 a.m. ET, the Conference Board will release its report on consumer confidence. This month's figure will be particularly important, as retailers gear up for the holiday shopping season. Economists expect a slight uptick in November.

Stocks ended mixed on Monday, the first full trading day since last Wednesday, as fiscal cliff concerns countered strong holiday shopping reports.

Companies: Packaged food maker ConAgra (CAG, Fortune 500) announced it has reached a deal to buy Ralcorp (RAH), the largest U.S. manufacturer of private label food, for $90 a share in cash -- a 28% premium from Monday's closing price.

Shares of Facebook (FB) rose more than 8% Monday after several analysts upgraded the stock. Facebook has rallied nearly 50% since touching a low of $17.55 in early September. The stock, currently around $26, is trading at its highest level since late July. Shares of Facebook gained another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.

Currencies and commodities: The dollar gained against the euro, the British pound and the Japanese yen.

Oil for January delivery gained 14 cents to $87.88 a barrel.

Gold futures for December delivery fell $3.10 to $1,746.50 an ounce.

Bonds: The price on the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury edged up, pushing the yield down to 1.65% from 1.66% late Monday. To top of page

First Published: November 27, 2012: 6:05 AM ET


19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More

UBS fined over rogue trading case

Written By limadu on Senin, 26 November 2012 | 21.29

British regulators have fined UBS nearly $50 million due to the actions of a rogue trader. Swiss authorities are reviewing the investment bank's capital base

LONDON (CNNMoney) -- British regulators have fined UBS nearly $50 million, and Switzerland may force the bank to raise more capital, after it failed to prevent a rogue trader running up $2.3 billion in losses last year.

Kweku Adoboli, a trader on the bank's exchange traded funds desk in London, was found guilty last week of two counts of fraud and sentenced to seven years in prison for his role in Britain's biggest trading scandal.

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) said a joint investigation into the case had revealed serious deficiencies in risk management and controls at UBS' investment bank.

"UBS failed to question the increasing revenue of the desk and failed to ensure that there was a corresponding increase in the controls in place over the desk," said Tracey McDermott, the FSA's director of enforcement and financial crime. "As a result, Adoboli, a relatively junior trader, was allowed to take vast and risky market positions and UBS failed to manage the risks around that properly."

The FSA fined UBS £29.7 million ($47.5 million), equivalent to 15% of the revenue of the global synthetic equities division of the ETF desk, and said the penalty would have been £42.4 million but for the bank's willingness to settle at an early stage.

UBS, which was bailed out by the Swiss government in 2008, last month announced a major overhaul, saying it would shed 10,000 jobs by 2015 and save $3.6 billion as it scales back investment banking to focus on wealth management.

Related: 9 more banks under scrutiny in Libor investigation

UBS said in a statement it had cooperated fully with the regulators since the losses were first discovered and was pleased that "this chapter has been concluded".

UBS has since disciplined a number of staff, including clawing back bonuses and other payments worth more than £34 million. It has also introduced a number of changes to the way staff are evaluated and rewarded.

FINMA, which had already imposed new controls on the investment bank in the wake of the rogue trading scandal, said Monday it would hire an audit firm to review whether the measures had proved effective. It would also be re-examining the capital base of the investment bank.

"All of these measures will take place over the next few quarters," FINMA spokesman Tobias Lux told CNNMoney.

The regulators' investigation found Adoboli used one-sided internal futures positions, delayed booking of transactions and fictitious deals to conceal the extent of his unauthorized trading.

But it also found serious weaknesses in UBS trading and risk management systems, and in the supervision of the desk. Managers were aware that risk limits were being breached but failed to take disciplinary action or investigate further.

To top of page

First Published: November 26, 2012: 7:04 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

8 things that could kill a fiscal cliff deal

Lawmakers will probably compromise on the fiscal cliff before Christmas. But if they do, it won't come easily.

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) -- Pete Davis is president of Davis Capital Investment Ideas. He worked for Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill, serving as an economist for the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Senate Budget Committee.

Despite what the optimists say, it's too early to count on a fiscal cliff deal.

Senior staffers have been trying to set the broad outlines of a compromise -- dollar amounts of revenue increases and spending cuts.

They're working up options for President Obama and congressional leaders to consider when they meet for their first substantive talks.

In my experience, the first thing that happens in such a meeting, after opening statements and procedural matters, is they reject all of the options the staff prepared.

Then they start arguing among themselves. After an hour or two, they tire of that and walk out on camera and tell the world they made progress.

Their staff then goes back and works all night on new options, and they meet again, and again, and again.

Here's my short list of why the fiscal cliff won't get resolved easily.

1. President Obama insists on a tax rate increase on those earning $250,000 or more, and House Republicans balk.

2. President Obama and Democrats refuse to accept revenue increases that won't be scored by the Congressional Budget Office -- i.e. that depend upon tax reform and/or upon an assumed increase in economic growth.

3. Republicans won't accept another extension of the temporary 2% payroll tax cut for working Americans. So President Obama may insist on a Making Work Pay tax credit much like the one from the 2009 stimulus package. That credit was worth up to $400 for single workers earning less than $95,000 and up to $800 for married couples making less than $190,000.

4. House Republicans insist on entitlement cuts that Senate Democrats won't accept. Senate Democrats see Social Security as completely off the table, and Medicare cuts will be difficult to achieve because most of the easier ones were used to pay for health care reform.

5. Everyone wants to repeal the $109 billion sequester of defense and nondefense spending, but Republicans may object if it's not "paid for."

6. Democrats want bigger defense cuts than Republicans will accept.

7. Discretionary spending can be shaved a bit more, but not much more without incurring Democratic opposition.

8. Republicans may refuse to accept a debt ceiling increase that is not "paid for." A one-year hike would cost about $1.2 trillion. There's no way they could pay for that.

I'm not ruling out a deal before Christmas, particularly one that combines a very modest "down payment" with procedures to deliver tax and entitlement reform. I've always said I see about a 40% chance of such a deal by December 24.

The problem for the market will be to gauge how much deficit reduction will ultimately be delivered. I expect to be underwhelmed.

This all comes down to how insistent President Obama will be on raising taxes on the rich and whether he will accept a deal without a rate increase.

All of the president's statements so far have upped the ante on a tax rate increase on those earning $250,000 or more. Sure, he has caved many times before on a wide range of issues, but will he do so following an election victory and when he never has to run again?

One big final impediment will remain after a deal is announced. The House may not pass it.

In July 2011, House Speaker John Boehner thought he had agreed to a deal with Obama that his colleagues would support, but House Republicans rejected it because it included revenue increases.

Boehner was put in the embarrassing position of having to return to the bargaining table and ended up cutting a smaller, kick-the-can-down-the-road deal, that resulted in the creation of the so-called Super Committee, which failed, and the $109 billion sequester that no one wants. I'm sure he'll be a lot more careful this time around to whip his support before finally signing off on a deal.

Of course, anything the House Republican Caucus will pass is unlikely to attract more than a handful of Democratic votes, even if Obama supports it. Boehner will not get united House Republican support for any deal. He may need Democratic votes to pass it, and Nancy Pelosi is unlikely to supply them.

I still see a 60% chance that we temporarily go over the fiscal cliff. After Obama and congressional leaders exhaust themselves by trying to reach agreement but failing, they may decide to risk the fiscal cliff for a short time rather than accept a bad deal. To top of page

First Published: November 26, 2012: 8:59 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Buffett renews argument for millionaire's tax

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Warren Buffett is again arguing for higher taxes on himself and other high-income individuals, calling for an even steeper bite than in the Obama administration's so-called "Buffett Rule."

In an op-ed column in Monday's New York Times, Buffett advocates that taxable income of between $1 million and $10 million should be taxed at a minimum 30% rate, and that income above $10 million should be taxed at 35%.

"A plain and simple rule like that will block the efforts of lobbyists, lawyers and contribution-hungry legislators to keep the ultrarich paying rates well below those incurred by people with income just a tiny fraction of ours," Buffett writes. "Only a minimum tax on very high incomes will prevent the stated tax rate from being eviscerated by these warriors for the wealthy."

President Obama, in arguing for a millionaire's tax that is commonly called the Buffett rule, is seeking a minimum 30% rate on income above $1 million.

While the top marginal tax rate is higher than 30%, many wealthy taxpayers pay less because their income comes from sources such as capital gains or carried interest, which have a lower tax rate.

Related: The wit and wisdom of Warren Buffett

Buffett said he also agrees with President Obama's call for allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire for high-income taxpayers, although he would set the cut-off at $500,000 a year, rather than the $250,000 threshold advocated by the president.

And Buffett said he doubts that raising taxes on the wealthy would do anything to slow needed investment and job creation. He cites much higher rates on capital gains and top wage earners that were in effect in the past.

"Never did anyone mention taxes as a reason to forgo an investment opportunity that I offered," he wrote. "So let's forget about the rich and ultrarich going on strike and stuffing their ample funds under their mattresses if — gasp — capital gains rates and ordinary income rates are increased. The ultrarich, including me, will forever pursue investment opportunities."

Related: The Buffett rule quiz

Buffett's column appeared as Congress returns from a holiday recess to resume negotiations on tax rates and federal spending, an effort to avoid the so-called "fiscal cliff" that will occur if there's not an agreement. Republican leadership has expressed a willingness to limit deductions for top wage earners, but they remain opposed to raising their tax rates.

Some have suggested comprehensive tax reform, which eliminates many deductions across the board and simplifies the tax code, would be the best policy for the economy. Buffett writes he supports such tax reform, but that he believes higher tax rates on the wealthy should be an interim step.

"The reform of such complexities should not promote delay in our correcting simple and expensive inequities," he wrote in the Times. "We can't let those who want to protect the privileged get away with insisting that we do nothing until we can do everything."

To top of page

First Published: November 26, 2012: 7:57 AM ET


21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger