No winners for $1 billion NCAA challenge

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The $1 billion prize for a perfect NCAA bracket that his Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA, Fortune 500) was backing will go unclaimed.

None of the fans who signed up for the perfect bracket challenge sponsored by Quicken Loans and Yahoo Sports made it out of the first round of 32 games played without at least one mistake. The two firms would not say how many fans entered the free contest.

Buffett sold an insurance policy to Quicken Loans and Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500) which would have compensated them if they had to pay out the 10-figure sum.

One estimate puts the odds of picking a perfect bracket at 9.2 quintillion to one -- an awkward, rarely-used number that can also be thought of as 9.2 billion-billion. Those odds are longer than the likelihood of winning Powerball and Mega Millions in the same weekend.

Related: College basketball's real billion dollar winner

But the 9.2 quintillion estimate assumes each team has a 50% chance of winning every game, which is probably not the case. Others have put the odds at a marginally better 7.4 billion to 1. That's 42 times worse than your chance of winning Powerball.

"There is no perfect math...There are no true odds, no one really knows," Buffett told CNN in January when the challenge was announced.

The odds became even longer with upsets this week. In Thursday's opener, 84% of fans picked Ohio State to win, only to see the University of Dayton upset its rival. Then on Friday upstart Mercer University knocked off perennial powerhouse Duke, which was the choice of 98% of fans with Yahoo brackets.

The tournament is so popular partly because of the history of first-round upsets that play havoc with fans' brackets.

Related: More billionaires pledge to give away fortunes

CBS Sports, which runs one of the bigger bracket challenges, says that in the past two years its final perfect brackets were eliminated in the 22nd and 23rd games of the tournament, or about two-thirds of the way through the first round.

ESPN reports that of the roughly 30 million entrants it's had over the 13 years, no one has come close to a perfect bracket, and that only one person has had a perfect first round in the last seven years.

"I don't want to say it's impossible, but it's basically impossible," said John Diver, director of product development for ESPN Fantasy.

First Published: March 22, 2014: 9:51 AM ET

21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Are Netflix users ripping off the rest of us?

Reed Hastings says Netflix is "reluctantly" paying for faster connections to broadband networks.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Hastings sounded off Thursday on the likes of Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500), Comcast (CMCSA, Fortune 500) and others, accusing them of "sacrific[ing] the interests of their own customers" in demanding fees to ensure quick delivery of content from Netflix (NFLX) and other data-intensive services.

The dispute flared up earlier this year following news that Netflix streaming speeds for customers of major ISPs were slowing, as these firms attempted to extract a fee from Netflix in exchange for connecting directly to their networks and resolving the issue.

Netflix announced an agreement with Comcast last month under which it will indeed pay for a connection, and has been in talks with Verizon as well.

Hastings said his company was engaging in these talks "reluctantly." He accused the ISPs of abusing their market power and short-changing customers.

Related: New chapter begins in net neutrality fight

But the ISPs tell a very different story. They point to the fact that Netflix generates a massive amount of data consumption -- around a third of traffic online during peak hours -- while sticking them with the ever-increasing delivery costs.

The National Cable and Telecommunications Association says just one percent of broadband subscribers -- primarily heavy streaming-video users -- consume nearly 40% of bandwidth going into homes.

Other big tech companies, including Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500), Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) and Facebook (FB, Fortune 500), already have paid-connection deals with big ISPs. Comcast vice president David Cohen said in response to Hastings that these arrangements "have been an essential part of the growth of the Internet for two decades."

Dan Rayburn, an industry analyst at Frost & Sullivan, says it's not clear that the ISPs are to blame for customers' lagging Netflix speeds. In a blog post Friday, he noted that Netflix has the option of rerouting the traffic it sends to ISPs when congestion occurs at one connection point.

The heart of the problem is that high-speed Internet networks are extremely expensive to deploy. There aren't many companies with the resources to do it, and there isn't enough competition in most regions to push ISPs to quickly upgrade their infrastructure.

Paid-connection deals like the one between Comcast and Netflix are part of the way the broadband industry wants to address this issue. But Hastings says this cost-sharing doesn't make sense if the ISPs aren't also willing to share subscription revenue.

"When an ISP sells a consumer a 10 or 50 megabits-per-second Internet package, the consumer should get that rate, no matter where the data is coming from," Hastings wrote in his blog post.

Related: Court strikes down net neutrality rules

ISPs have accused Netflix of "dumping" data onto their networks, a characterization that Hastings rejected.

"Netflix isn't 'dumping' data; it's satisfying requests made by ISP customers who pay a lot of money for high speed Internet," Hastings wrote. "If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Going forward, broadband providers would like to move to a tiered pricing structure for customers depending on how much data they consume, similar to those offered by mobile carriers.

"[I]t's unfair to ask lighter users to subsidize super-user activity," the NCTA says.

But part of that formula will likely involve letting content providers subsidize consumer data consumption that goes toward their services. AT&T announced this kind of "sponsored data" program earlier this year for the mobile Web. The worry with this system is that it favors established companies that can pay up for speedy delivery of their content, putting smaller firms at a disadvantage and potentially stifling innovation.

"On a tiered Internet controlled by the phone and cable companies, only their own content and services -- or those offered by corporate partners that pony up enough 'protection money' -- will enjoy life in the fast lane," the advocacy group Free Press says.

First Published: March 21, 2014: 5:34 PM ET

21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Candy Crush mania coming to Wall Street

The game is addictive, will the stock be too?

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

King Digital Entertainment, which makes the popular Candy Crush Saga online game, is one of 14 companies set to go public this week.

The U.K. based company, which will list on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol 'KING', plans to sell about 22 million shares at a price somewhere between $21 and $24 per share.

Based on the midpoint of that range, King would have a market value of about $7 billion. King had annual revenue of $1.9 billion and a profit of about $568 million in 2013, according to its prospectus.

Compared with some of its rivals, such as Zynga (ZNGA) and Activision (ATVI), King's stock may be "fairly valued," said Tim Keating, chief executive of Keating Capital, a fund that specializes in making pre-IPO investments but does not own a stake in King. Zynga is worth about $4 billion while Activision has a market value of around $15 billion.

Keating said some investors are concerned that King's profits are too closely tied to the success of one game. But he added that King's profit margins are strong and its revenue growth over the past year has been an "eye popping" 1000%.

Related: European IPOs boom as bull market runs

Even though stocks have been volatile lately due to geopolitical concerns, the Nasdaq is still all up more than 2% so far this year. And that's helped fuel strong demand for IPOs.

There have been 53 new listings in the United States so far this year, according to IPO research and investment firm Renaissance Capital. In the same period last year, there were just 30 companies that went public.

At that rate, the number of IPOs this year could rival last year's total of 222, which was the highest number since 2000.

Most of the stocks that have debuted this year have outperformed the broader market. The average IPO has increased 35% from its offering price so far this year, according to Renaissance.

Related: Candy Crush company founder left $1 billion on the table

Healthcare software company Castlight Health (CSLT), which debuted earlier this month, has doubled from its offering price. Biotech Dicerna Pharmaceuticals (DRNA), which went public in late January, is up nearly 180%. So is Auspex Pharmaceuticals (ASPX), which started trading in early February.

And on Friday, biotech Versartis (VSAR) surged about 50% from its offering price.

In fact, the healthcare sector has been by far the most popular in the IPO market. So far this year, 29 healthcare companies have gone public.

The robust IPO market is a continuation of last year's bumper crop. Keating said much of the boom in IPO activity is linked to the JOBS Act, which removed some obstacles for smaller companies to go public.

More broadly, investors have been drawn to IPOs for the strong growth that newly public companies promise.

Still, Keating noted that roughly three-quarters of the companies that have gone public recently have not been profitable, which is up from the long-term average of about 50%.

That could be a sign of some froth in the market, though the IPO boom could continue for some time, Keating added.

First Published: March 23, 2014: 8:42 AM ET

21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Are Netflix users ripping off the rest of us?

Reed Hastings says Netflix is "reluctantly" paying for faster connections to broadband networks.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Hastings sounded off Thursday on the likes of Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500), Comcast (CMCSA, Fortune 500) and others, accusing them of "sacrific[ing] the interests of their own customers" in demanding fees to ensure quick delivery of content from Netflix (NFLX) and other data-intensive services.

The dispute flared up earlier this year following news that Netflix streaming speeds for customers of major ISPs were slowing, as these firms attempted to extract a fee from Netflix in exchange for connecting directly to their networks and resolving the issue.

Netflix announced an agreement with Comcast last month under which it will indeed pay for a connection, and has been in talks with Verizon as well.

Hastings said his company was engaging in these talks "reluctantly." He accused the ISPs of abusing their market power and short-changing customers.

Related: New chapter begins in net neutrality fight

But the ISPs tell a very different story. They point to the fact that Netflix generates a massive amount of data consumption -- around a third of traffic online during peak hours -- while sticking them with the ever-increasing delivery costs.

The National Cable and Telecommunications Association says just one percent of broadband subscribers -- primarily heavy streaming-video users -- consume nearly 40% of bandwidth going into homes.

Other big tech companies, including Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500), Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) and Facebook (FB, Fortune 500), already have paid-connection deals with big ISPs. Comcast vice president David Cohen said in response to Hastings that these arrangements "have been an essential part of the growth of the Internet for two decades."

Dan Rayburn, an industry analyst at Frost & Sullivan, says it's not clear that the ISPs are to blame for customers' lagging Netflix speeds. In a blog post Friday, he noted that Netflix has the option of rerouting the traffic it sends to ISPs when congestion occurs at one connection point.

The heart of the problem is that high-speed Internet networks are extremely expensive to deploy. There aren't many companies with the resources to do it, and there isn't enough competition in most regions to push ISPs to quickly upgrade their infrastructure.

Paid-connection deals like the one between Comcast and Netflix are part of the way the broadband industry wants to address this issue. But Hastings says this cost-sharing doesn't make sense if the ISPs aren't also willing to share subscription revenue.

"When an ISP sells a consumer a 10 or 50 megabits-per-second Internet package, the consumer should get that rate, no matter where the data is coming from," Hastings wrote in his blog post.

Related: Court strikes down net neutrality rules

ISPs have accused Netflix of "dumping" data onto their networks, a characterization that Hastings rejected.

"Netflix isn't 'dumping' data; it's satisfying requests made by ISP customers who pay a lot of money for high speed Internet," Hastings wrote. "If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Going forward, broadband providers would like to move to a tiered pricing structure for customers depending on how much data they consume, similar to those offered by mobile carriers.

"[I]t's unfair to ask lighter users to subsidize super-user activity," the NCTA says.

But part of that formula will likely involve letting content providers subsidize consumer data consumption that goes toward their services. AT&T announced this kind of "sponsored data" program earlier this year for the mobile Web. The worry with this system is that it favors established companies that can pay up for speedy delivery of their content, putting smaller firms at a disadvantage and potentially stifling innovation.

"On a tiered Internet controlled by the phone and cable companies, only their own content and services -- or those offered by corporate partners that pony up enough 'protection money' -- will enjoy life in the fast lane," the advocacy group Free Press says.

First Published: March 21, 2014: 5:34 PM ET

19.34 | 0 komentar | Read More

Taxpayers hit with fewer audits

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The agency audited 1.4 million people last year, down 5% from 2012 and the lowest number of audits conducted since 2008, according to IRS statistics released Friday.

The IRS blamed its shrinking budget for the drop-off, saying "an ongoing decline in appropriate funding presented challenges."

Related: 10 tax audit red flags

Since 2010, the agency's budget has been reduced by almost $1 billion and around 10,000 employees have been cut. Under the 2014 budget, the IRS will receive $11.3 billion -- nearly $2 billion less than the White House had requested for the agency and a $526 million drop from 2013.

Meanwhile, government spending cuts last year forced the IRS to furlough workers without pay for three days, making it even harder for the agency to keep up with its workload.

To cut costs, the IRS has been conducting more audits by mail than in person. Last year, more than three-quarters of examinations were correspondence audits, and the rest were field audits -- meaning they were conducted at an IRS office or a taxpayer's home.

Related: Quiz - 7 surprising 2014 tax facts

And while the overall number of audits was low, at around 1% of all taxpayers, there are still certain groups that aren't getting a break.

One of those groups is the rich: About 9% of taxpayers with income between $1 million and $5 million were audited last year, and that rate rose to 16% for those with income between $5 million and $10 million. For the nation's top earners, with income over $10 million, the audit rate was 24%.

Business owners are also more likely to be audited, and so are taxpayers who claim a home office deduction or the Earned Income Tax Credit. Reporting -- or failing to report -- a foreign bank account could also lead to additional scrutiny, as the IRS continues to crackdown on people hiding offshore income.

Related: Tax season unleashes cyberscams

In addition to being unable to conduct as many audits, the agency's taxpayer assistance has been deteriorating, the National Treasury Employees Union said in a statement Friday.

"We are seeing the results of these reductions in staffing, particularly in customer service, all across the country," NTEU president Colleen Kelley said. "Both taxpayers and employees are frustrated by the lengthy lines at Taxpayer Assistance Centers and the long telephone hold times for those who call the IRS with a question."

First Published: March 21, 2014: 4:58 PM ET

19.34 | 0 komentar | Read More

No winners for $1 billion NCAA challenge

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The $1 billion prize for a perfect NCAA bracket that his Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA, Fortune 500) was backing will go unclaimed.

None of the fans who signed up for the perfect bracket challenge sponsored by Quicken Loans and Yahoo Sports made it out of the first round of 32 games played without at least one mistake. The two firms would not say how many fans entered the free contest.

Buffett sold an insurance policy to Quicken Loans and Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500) which would have compensated them if they had to pay out the 10-figure sum.

One estimate puts the odds of picking a perfect bracket at 9.2 quintillion to one -- an awkward, rarely-used number that can also be thought of as 9.2 billion-billion. Those odds are longer than the likelihood of winning Powerball and Mega Millions in the same weekend.

Related: College basketball's real billion dollar winner

But the 9.2 quintillion estimate assumes each team has a 50% chance of winning every game, which is probably not the case. Others have put the odds at a marginally better 7.4 billion to 1. That's 42 times worse than your chance of winning Powerball.

"There is no perfect math...There are no true odds, no one really knows," Buffett told CNN in January when the challenge was announced.

The odds became even longer with upsets this week. In Thursday's opener, 84% of fans picked Ohio State to win, only to see the University of Dayton upset its rival. Then on Friday upstart Mercer University knocked off perennial powerhouse Duke, which was the choice of 98% of fans with Yahoo brackets.

The tournament is so popular partly because of the history of first-round upsets that play havoc with fans' brackets.

Related: More billionaires pledge to give away fortunes

CBS Sports, which runs one of the bigger bracket challenges, says that in the past two years its final perfect brackets were eliminated in the 22nd and 23rd games of the tournament, or about two-thirds of the way through the first round.

ESPN reports that of the roughly 30 million entrants it's had over the 13 years, no one has come close to a perfect bracket, and that only one person has had a perfect first round in the last seven years.

"I don't want to say it's impossible, but it's basically impossible," said John Diver, director of product development for ESPN Fantasy.

First Published: March 22, 2014: 9:51 AM ET

19.34 | 0 komentar | Read More

Taxpayers hit with fewer audits

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The agency audited 1.4 million people last year, down 5% from 2012 and the lowest number of audits conducted since 2008, according to IRS statistics released Friday.

The IRS blamed its shrinking budget for the drop-off, saying "an ongoing decline in appropriate funding presented challenges."

Related: 10 tax audit red flags

Since 2010, the agency's budget has been reduced by almost $1 billion and around 10,000 employees have been cut. Under the 2014 budget, the IRS will receive $11.3 billion -- nearly $2 billion less than the White House had requested for the agency and a $526 million drop from 2013.

Meanwhile, government spending cuts last year forced the IRS to furlough workers without pay for three days, making it even harder for the agency to keep up with its workload.

To cut costs, the IRS has been conducting more audits by mail than in person. Last year, more than three-quarters of examinations were correspondence audits, and the rest were field audits -- meaning they were conducted at an IRS office or a taxpayer's home.

Related: Quiz - 7 surprising 2014 tax facts

And while the overall number of audits was low, at around 1% of all taxpayers, there are still certain groups that aren't getting a break.

One of those groups is the rich: About 9% of taxpayers with income between $1 million and $5 million were audited last year, and that rate rose to 16% for those with income between $5 million and $10 million. For the nation's top earners, with income over $10 million, the audit rate was 24%.

Business owners are also more likely to be audited, and so are taxpayers who claim a home office deduction or the Earned Income Tax Credit. Reporting -- or failing to report -- a foreign bank account could also lead to additional scrutiny, as the IRS continues to crackdown on people hiding offshore income.

Related: Tax season unleashes cyberscams

In addition to being unable to conduct as many audits, the agency's taxpayer assistance has been deteriorating, the National Treasury Employees Union said in a statement Friday.

"We are seeing the results of these reductions in staffing, particularly in customer service, all across the country," NTEU president Colleen Kelley said. "Both taxpayers and employees are frustrated by the lengthy lines at Taxpayer Assistance Centers and the long telephone hold times for those who call the IRS with a question."

First Published: March 21, 2014: 4:58 PM ET

21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Are Netflix users ripping off the rest of us?

Reed Hastings says Netflix is "reluctantly" paying for faster connections to broadband networks.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Hastings sounded off Thursday on the likes of Verizon (VZ, Fortune 500), Comcast (CMCSA, Fortune 500) and others, accusing them of "sacrific[ing] the interests of their own customers" in demanding fees to ensure quick delivery of content from Netflix (NFLX) and other data-intensive services.

The dispute flared up earlier this year following news that Netflix streaming speeds for customers of major ISPs were slowing, as these firms attempted to extract a fee from Netflix in exchange for connecting directly to their networks and resolving the issue.

Netflix announced an agreement with Comcast last month under which it will indeed pay for a connection, and has been in talks with Verizon as well.

Hastings said his company was engaging in these talks "reluctantly." He accused the ISPs of abusing their market power and short-changing customers.

Related: New chapter begins in net neutrality fight

But the ISPs tell a very different story. They point to the fact that Netflix generates a massive amount of data consumption -- around a third of traffic online during peak hours -- while sticking them with the ever-increasing delivery costs.

The National Cable and Telecommunications Association says just one percent of broadband subscribers -- primarily heavy streaming-video users -- consume nearly 40% of bandwidth going into homes.

Other big tech companies, including Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500), Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) and Facebook (FB, Fortune 500), already have paid-connection deals with big ISPs. Comcast vice president David Cohen said in response to Hastings that these arrangements "have been an essential part of the growth of the Internet for two decades."

Dan Rayburn, an industry analyst at Frost & Sullivan, says it's not clear that the ISPs are to blame for customers' lagging Netflix speeds. In a blog post Friday, he noted that Netflix has the option of rerouting the traffic it sends to ISPs when congestion occurs at one connection point.

The heart of the problem is that high-speed Internet networks are extremely expensive to deploy. There aren't many companies with the resources to do it, and there isn't enough competition in most regions to push ISPs to quickly upgrade their infrastructure.

Paid-connection deals like the one between Comcast and Netflix are part of the way the broadband industry wants to address this issue. But Hastings says this cost-sharing doesn't make sense if the ISPs aren't also willing to share subscription revenue.

"When an ISP sells a consumer a 10 or 50 megabits-per-second Internet package, the consumer should get that rate, no matter where the data is coming from," Hastings wrote in his blog post.

Related: Court strikes down net neutrality rules

ISPs have accused Netflix of "dumping" data onto their networks, a characterization that Hastings rejected.

"Netflix isn't 'dumping' data; it's satisfying requests made by ISP customers who pay a lot of money for high speed Internet," Hastings wrote. "If this kind of leverage is effective against Netflix, which is pretty large, imagine the plight of smaller services today and in the future."

Going forward, broadband providers would like to move to a tiered pricing structure for customers depending on how much data they consume, similar to those offered by mobile carriers.

"[I]t's unfair to ask lighter users to subsidize super-user activity," the NCTA says.

But part of that formula will likely involve letting content providers subsidize consumer data consumption that goes toward their services. AT&T announced this kind of "sponsored data" program earlier this year for the mobile Web. The worry with this system is that it favors established companies that can pay up for speedy delivery of their content, putting smaller firms at a disadvantage and potentially stifling innovation.

"On a tiered Internet controlled by the phone and cable companies, only their own content and services -- or those offered by corporate partners that pony up enough 'protection money' -- will enjoy life in the fast lane," the advocacy group Free Press says.

First Published: March 21, 2014: 5:34 PM ET

21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

No winners for $1 billion NCAA challenge

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The $1 billion prize for a perfect NCAA bracket that his Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA, Fortune 500) was backing will go unclaimed.

None of the fans who signed up for the perfect bracket challenge sponsored by Quicken Loans and Yahoo Sports made it out of the first round of 32 games played without at least one mistake. The two firms would not say how many fans entered the free contest.

Buffett sold an insurance policy to Quicken Loans and Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500) which would have compensated them if they had to pay out the 10-figure sum.

One estimate puts the odds of picking a perfect bracket at 9.2 quintillion to one -- an awkward, rarely-used number that can also be thought of as 9.2 billion-billion. Those odds are longer than the likelihood of winning Powerball and Mega Millions in the same weekend.

Related: College basketball's real billion dollar winner

But the 9.2 quintillion estimate assumes each team has a 50% chance of winning every game, which is probably not the case. Others have put the odds at a marginally better 7.4 billion to 1. That's 42 times worse than your chance of winning Powerball.

"There is no perfect math...There are no true odds, no one really knows," Buffett told CNN in January when the challenge was announced.

The odds became even longer with upsets this week. In Thursday's opener, 84% of fans picked Ohio State to win, only to see the University of Dayton upset its rival. Then on Friday upstart Mercer University knocked off perennial powerhouse Duke, which was the choice of 98% of fans with Yahoo brackets.

The tournament is so popular partly because of the history of first-round upsets that play havoc with fans' brackets.

Related: More billionaires pledge to give away fortunes

CBS Sports, which runs one of the bigger bracket challenges, says that in the past two years its final perfect brackets were eliminated in the 22nd and 23rd games of the tournament, or about two-thirds of the way through the first round.

ESPN reports that of the roughly 30 million entrants it's had over the 13 years, no one has come close to a perfect bracket, and that only one person has had a perfect first round in the last seven years.

"I don't want to say it's impossible, but it's basically impossible," said John Diver, director of product development for ESPN Fantasy.

First Published: March 22, 2014: 9:51 AM ET

21.29 | 0 komentar | Read More

Taxpayers hit with fewer audits

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The agency audited 1.4 million people last year, down 5% from 2012 and the lowest number of audits conducted since 2008, according to IRS statistics released Friday.

The IRS blamed its shrinking budget for the drop-off, saying "an ongoing decline in appropriate funding presented challenges."

Related: 10 tax audit red flags

Since 2010, the agency's budget has been reduced by almost $1 billion and around 10,000 employees have been cut. Under the 2014 budget, the IRS will receive $11.3 billion -- nearly $2 billion less than the White House had requested for the agency and a $526 million drop from 2013.

Meanwhile, government spending cuts last year forced the IRS to furlough workers without pay for three days, making it even harder for the agency to keep up with its workload.

To cut costs, the IRS has been conducting more audits by mail than in person. Last year, more than three-quarters of examinations were correspondence audits, and the rest were field audits -- meaning they were conducted at an IRS office or a taxpayer's home.

Related: Quiz - 7 surprising 2014 tax facts

And while the overall number of audits was low, at around 1% of all taxpayers, there are still certain groups that aren't getting a break.

One of those groups is the rich: About 9% of taxpayers with income between $1 million and $5 million were audited last year, and that rate rose to 16% for those with income between $5 million and $10 million. For the nation's top earners, with income over $10 million, the audit rate was 24%.

Business owners are also more likely to be audited, and so are taxpayers who claim a home office deduction or the Earned Income Tax Credit. Reporting -- or failing to report -- a foreign bank account could also lead to additional scrutiny, as the IRS continues to crackdown on people hiding offshore income.

Related: Tax season unleashes cyberscams

In addition to being unable to conduct as many audits, the agency's taxpayer assistance has been deteriorating, the National Treasury Employees Union said in a statement Friday.

"We are seeing the results of these reductions in staffing, particularly in customer service, all across the country," NTEU president Colleen Kelley said. "Both taxpayers and employees are frustrated by the lengthy lines at Taxpayer Assistance Centers and the long telephone hold times for those who call the IRS with a question."

First Published: March 21, 2014: 4:58 PM ET

19.33 | 0 komentar | Read More